<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some stats, some dubious</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virtual-china.org/2006/07/04/some-stats-some-dubious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virtual-china.org/2006/07/04/some-stats-some-dubious/</link>
	<description>An exploration of virtual experiences and environments in and about China.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 09:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lyn</title>
		<link>http://www.virtual-china.org/2006/07/04/some-stats-some-dubious/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 20:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://207.47.0.153/?p=271#comment-334</guid>
		<description>The last is indeed interesting. It could be that the folks who answered the survey felt that they "should" say that they support the fatigue law (which removes all in-game incentives for continuing play after 3-5 hours).  Another possibility is that older gamers DO support the fatigue law for younger gamers, and have their own ways of getting around the regulation.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last is indeed interesting. It could be that the folks who answered the survey felt that they &#8220;should&#8221; say that they support the fatigue law (which removes all in-game incentives for continuing play after 3-5 hours).  Another possibility is that older gamers DO support the fatigue law for younger gamers, and have their own ways of getting around the regulation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

