Archive for the 'Internet governance' Category

City’s men (城管) egao-ed on Baidu Baike

Headline image from 玩聚 on ju690 (with my translation in white):

The story goes that an officer within Chong Qing city administration (城管) looked up 城管 (city administration)”on Baidu Baike (= Baidu’s Wikipedia competitor) and found the following:

“City administration… A mafia (黑社會) that bullies storekeepers unable to pay their rent or economically challenged groups with problems with their licenses… Adjectives: Cruel, bloody, frightening… Verbs: Beat, smash, rob…”

This entry obviously distressed the poor officer, who himself was part of the city administration. It only hurt him more that Baidu Baike is supposedly written with the consensus of the greater netizen population.

What he may or may not know, however, is that he’s a victim of the greater egao (恶搞: spoofing/pranking) movement that is making its rounds on the Chinese internet.

Yet why did they egao city administration in particular? 王清 suggests on his blog that it’s a manifestation of the tension created by past incidents involving the city administration and small merchants. 王清 even goes as far as to say that it’s a call for reform and regulation on the role of city administration across the country.

And what happened to the entry in the end? Since the entry was first egao-ed on April 3, Baidu Baike has fixed it and erased the evidence of the egao edits (see deleted entries in their revision history)… but not before screenshots were captured for a Netease article.

Original story, sources and excerpts translated from 玩聚 on ju690.

The internet police is cute (and male).

Newpolice Newplace2

Previously blogged, China’s Internet Police, and now back with new animated, region-customized imagery. They float on-screen, on the bottom left, to show they’re watching. They also sometimes get in the way of the text (which I don’t quite understand).

Click on them will bring you to the their BBS, like this (please bear with my rough translation) Chongqing Urban Safety Public Annoucements Internet Saftey BBS. There netizens can ask them questions, and, at least in this case, they respond assuming the form of a slick, well-spoken avatar.

Here he is, dispensing advice about stolen QQ numbers and property:

Inetpoliceonforum

Net nanny’s mysterious ways

In the wake of the clamor over Tibet… BBC News has been unblocked.

Image from BBC News:

BBCNews

I wonder if this move has anything with do with the anti-CNN sentiment* floating around the interweb.

Original BBC News story here.

*In case you haven’t been reading up: CNN has been blamed for their coverage of the recent incidents in Tibet because they a) cropped photos to suit their story, and b) used photos of Nepalese police arrests for their China stories. See ESWN for more details.

Virtual China: Server switching woes

Apologies for those of you who’ve been bumped off the RSS feed or accessing strange 404 errors, but we’re in the middle of transitioning off of the Typepad platform (not very accessible in China) onto our own servers.

I’m currently hosting the blog myself (it currently forwards to virtualchina.hongkonggong.com), but I’m hoping to throw it on an IFTF server as soon as they’ll set it up for me.

Remember, you can always reach us at:
http://www.virtual-china.org

Safe virtual worlds for Chinese children?

I’m going to tell this story backwards from the way I read it on billsdue, because I have a different take on it.

Part 1: BaoBao BengBeng (宝宝蹦蹦)

BaoBao BengBeng is a safe, candy-coated virtual world for kids. See the video above — there are rooms, cutesy avatars, items/inventories and casual games built in. It looks like it’s targeted towards elementary schoolers.

(Listen to Danwei’s interview with their CEO here. Visit their website here.)

Part 2: 17-year-old boy burns classmate in retaliation because he’s a WoW Fire Mage

Wowfiremage

The boy responsible gave his classmate a third-degree burn on 38% of his body and is being sent to jail for 8 years. Talking reporters after the trial, he said:

我喜欢模仿游戏人物,特酷,有种“一统天下”的感觉。到后来,虚拟和现实界限已模糊,分不开了。(I love the characters in virtual worlds, it’s cool, and there’s a feeling of "being on top of the world." Afterwards, the boundaries between real and virtual worlds blurred in my mind.)

(See original 新京报 article here.)

Analysis

While some have suggested that BaoBao BengBeng (above) is a safe alternative to violent worlds like WoW, they’re actually two worlds for two audiences. BaoBao BengBeng is for elementary schoolers and WoW is for teenagers. You’d be hard pressed to find teenage boys roaming on BaoBao BengBeng for fun (unless there’s a meeting girls component…).

To take a step back: I really think virtual worlds are not the solution for virtual worlds. In this case, there’s blame attributed to the behaviors promoted by the virtual world, and these behaviors have been catalyzed by an intense attachment to the virtual world. But if the boy had other things to do, other things to play, other places to hang out — perhaps he wouldn’t be roaming the halls at school as a fire mage with a can of gasoline in his "inventory."

Via Game|Life & billsdue.

Hong Kong falls yet again

The Hong Kong government proves yet again that it is decidedly backward with regards to internet governance.

Original article from ESWN:

  • "’fireman 1324′ at the chat room ‘Adult Images Posting Area’…"
  • posted links to overseas pornographic material
  • "Police raided a Sham Shui Po flat and arrested Woo"
  • "fireman 1324" is fined $5000 HKD (~$650 USD)

See previously on Virtual China:

It seems like the HK government likes to single out individual internet users and arrest/fine them to make an example out of them.

Even then, to fine someone for posting a dirty hyperlink in an "adult" section?

Link to original article on ESWN.

China IPv6 update

I’ve been trying to follow the development of China’s IPv6 network, dubbed China Next Generation Internet (CNGI).  Background can be found in this earlier post.  Basically, the CNGI is a bold 5 year plan by Chinese leaders (specifically, the National Development and
Reform Commission (NDRC)) to leapfrog Chinese researchers, businesses, and technologies ahead of current Internet standards and infrastructure by 2009.  Recent news from the IPv6 Portal Newsroom:

In early November one of the fastest links in the world was established between Beijing and Tianjin, as part of the CERNET2 (China Education and Research Network), an infrastructure linking China’s top universities and research institutions.  The link delivers 40 Gigabits per second.

For more detailed info, read this Asian Internet.com article, which reports that Juniper Networks routers are being deployed.  According to a Juniper spokesperson,

"40G is currently the fastest generally available networking interface, so
it would be safe to say this is the fastest link in China," Hayes said.
"While it is of course always possible that there may be other 40G Links
that nobody is talking about, neither we nor CERNET know of any others in
production in China, and we have searched and asked.

"In the world, there are likely a small number of others (but not many) as
fast, but there would not be anything faster."

Additionally, CERNET is piloting a Wi-Fi initiative with the IPv6 network on 3 Chinese campuses and will be using Motorola’s HotZone Duo.  It will be very interesting to see how wireless access to such a highspeed network will change study, research, and communication practices. As a Motorola press release says:

CERNET's deployment of HotZone Duo will allow teachers, studentsand researchers ubiquitous wireless access to online courses, research,educational tools and a breadth of communication possibilities fromanywhere on campus.

keeping up with conferences: Internet governance; Chinese bloggers

If simply keeping up on the virtual world weren’t enough, there’s the real world as well!  Here’s a quick update on a couple of recent/ongoing important meetings shaping the future of Virtual China:

The first ever Internet Governance Forum (IGF), defined by Wikipedia as "a global venue under the auspices of the United Nations, established to
accommodate multi – stakeholder policy dialogue in the field of
internet governance. It purports to bring together all stakeholders in
the internet governance debate, whether they represent states, the
private sector or civil society, on an equal basis and through an open
and inclusive process."

Over 1500 attendees representing governments, companies, organisations and themselves are attending the 4 day meeting in Athens, running from October 30 through November 2. At the IGF website there are instructions for accessing the live video stream from the conference, participating in chat rooms, and even texting in questions to specific panels (but only in English, Spanish, or French). It also tells you what sessions are happening in real-time. 

The IGF helpfully provides highlights of panels, such as this morning’s panel on Openness, at which "A Chinese government representative from the audience (who insisted
that he had no problems accessing the BBC Web site from his office in
Geneva), insisted with a straight face that there were no restrictions
on access to Internet content in China, provoking derisive laughter
from the audience."   

Also check out the BBC’s excellent Reporters Log from the IGF.

(via Jack Linchuan Qiu on ChineseInternetResearch)

Cnbloggercon_1

Second, there was the high-powered Chinese Bloggers Conference 2006 (or, CnBloggerCon), which took place in Hangzhou over the weekend of October 28 and 29. The conference blog (in Chinese) includes downloadable presentations on Internet Trust (by Dr. Cheng Lihua, psychologist, Zhongshan University) and on the Internet, Blogging, and the Creative Spirit (by Fang Xingdong, head of blogging service Bokee.com, also with Chinalabs.com and Beijing Normal University). 

Partners Deb Fallows at the Pew Internet & American Life Project, Berkeley School of Journalism, and Professor Ashley Esarey, Political Science, Middlebury, launched their online survey of Chinese bloggers, which will give us Pew-quality data on the Chinese blogging population.   

Rebecca McKinnon attended and, as usual, provides coverage no-one else does in English at her blog  RConversation. She writes:

The people in this room are not socially disruptive revolutionaries.
They are people who would like to get on with the business of finding
ways to use the Internet to improve people’s lives.  To the extent that
politics won’t prevent them from doing so, they would prefer not to be
involved with politics.

…If one extrapolates China’s future from this group of individuals, you
see a peace-loving, compassionate, humanistic, globally minded,
flexible, hard-working lot who are well poised to drive Chinese
innovation…. and to drive it in directions that the entire world
should certainly welcome. The Chinese government would be crazy not to
embrace them as poster kids for China’s future. If the government is
not capable of doing so, it will be to the long-term detriment not only
of China’s economy but also of China’s global credibility, which in
turn has an impact on China’s long-term global influence.

Rebecca also blogs IT guru Keso’s keynote speech, which is very helpful for those of us who were not there!

IPv6: China’s next generation Internet

On Sept. 23 China announced the launch of the world’s largest pure next-generation Internet. Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) will replace the current Internet, which is Internet Protocol Version 4. The Chinese network, called CNGI-CERNET2/6IX, or CERNET2 for short, and broadly referred to by the name China Next-Generation Internet (CNGI) project, currently links 167 institutes at 25 universities, in 20 different cities (a long article in the Chinese journal Internet Society from Chinanews.com notes that the average age of researchers is 33). It also has links to telecom operators China Telecom, China Unicom, China Mobile, China Tietong, as well as partner equipment providers ZTE, Tsinghua Unisplendor and Tsinghua Tongfang. CERNET2 uses Chinese IPv6 routers rather than the foreign routers that support the current network around the world. Chinese experts say it will take about ten years to make the full transition from IPv4 to IPv6.

A few thoughts to share. CNGI will:

  • move data at around 100 times current Internet speeds.
  • support online streaming video at unprecented levels.
  • allow the over 160 various departments and institutions on CERNET2 to set up experimental labs and conduct research into new applications that we may not have seen before.
  • position Chinese router companies like ZTE and Huawei in the forefront of producing 10-Gigabit core routers for IPv6 infra around the world. IPv4 system routers are what have made the fortunes of companies like Cisco and Juniper Networks.
  • drive new technology deals and innovations. For example, British company Spirent Communications was chosen by the Chinese as a provider of test solutions for the new routers.
  • allow China to develop new standards for the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), which develops and promotes Internet standards. The Chinese are hoping their standards will significantly shape the development of IPv6.  China has already prepared a number of standards for the IETF.
  • position Chinese science and technology as a force to be reckoned with. It’s already (and rightfully so) a source of great pride to Chinese.  As Cui Yong, assistant professor in the computer science department at Qinghua University, says in the Internet Society article: "We want to let [the IETF] see that Chinese technology indeed has a great deal of innovation and excellence, and irreplaceability, which will play a large role in furthering the progress of the global next generation Internet. At the last meeting when a[n IETF] Vice Director asked the 200 participants for their opinions on the blueprint that we have provided, the blueprint received widespread support. I have a vivid memory of the excitement and encouragement in the room."
  • be unveiled at the 2008 Beijing Olympics, which will provide the world’s biggest marketing platform, letting foreign media and tourists experience IPv6 themselves.
  • support an infinite number of IP addresses, providing the platform for what many call The Internet of Things — a world in which objects have their own IP addresses and can share data (see Julian Bleecker’s Anne Galloway’s excellent bibliography on the subject, which includes several papers of Bleeckers such as "A Manifesto for Networked Objects"; as well as this ITU report).

A little history helps provide context for the concept of the next-gen Internet. This must-read July editorial in CIO magazine by Ben Worthen explains why the current IPv4 Internet is becoming outdated:

[In 1983 the developers of the Internet] adopted an addressing system, IPv4, so that computers connected to the Internet could each have a unique identity for recognizing and communicating with each other. The addressing scheme, which uses a series of four decimal values, each of which can be a number from 0 to 255 (also known as 32-bit addressing), has a total of 4.3 billion possible addresses. In 1976, when computer engineers Vint Cerf and Robert Kahn developed IPv4, that seemed like plenty. "[A longer address] sounded just a little excessive in 1976," Cerf said at a government roundtable in 2004. "I mean, after all, [the Internet] was an experiment. So I thought, well, 4.3 billion addresses should be enough for an experiment."

The IPv6 Portal picks up the story:

With the rapid growth of the Internet through the 1990’s, there was a rapid reduction in the number of free IP addresses available under IPv4, which was never designed to scale to these levels. In order to get more addresses, you need more bits, which means a longer IP address, which means a new
architecture, which means changes to all of the routing software. In other words, a major change on which everyone needs to agree, and does not come about quickly.

IPv6 increases IP addresses from 4 decimal values to 16–giving us a practically infinite number of IP addresses.

Some reactions to the announcement last week: I found this thread on Broadband Reports.com, in response to the recent news. It tailspins amazingly quickly into tired rhetoric from Americans about a) how it doesn’t matter anyway because China has no free speech (I guess the idea here is that the most important thing about the Internet is that it allows people to talk about politics–a pretty narrow view); b) how China is just copying "our" technology and has can’t innovate (sounds like sour grapes); and from Chinese about how great China is and how it will dominate the world.

For further reading:

China IPv6 Council (unfortunately their server is down as I write this and I can’t tell you anything about it)

Slashdot, China vs. US in an ‘Internet Race’

"China Builds a Better Internet," July 15 2006, CIO magazine.

The IPv6 Portal, newsroom

The status of Chinese domain names

The status of Chinese domain names… not ready.

For example, www.新浪.com (sina) leads to a not found error at http://www.xn--efvx5o.com/.

A more interesting example is www.搜狗.com (sogou), which redirects to http://www.epai.com/yima/domain/domain.htm, which redirects to http://999.5333.com/, which redirects to a generic domain not in use portal http://www.chunu.com, shown below, with some interesting text links (albeit non-working):

20060911_chuunu_1